Hairo

the Lost Ancient Language of Northern Central Europe


© 2005 by Christian Thalmann <cinga at gmx dot net>

Comparatively few laymen are aware that the well-known Indo-European language group that dominates the linguistic landscape of Europe nowadays is not native to this area. In fact, it came by oral spread, mass migration and conquest, supplanting the older, native languages of Europe. Basque and Sámi are among the few and isolated survivors. Other languages, like Etruscan, Pictish and Hairo, were not so lucky.

Unbeknownst to all but the most interested contemporary academics and amateur historians, the Hairon civilization dwelled and prospered around the North Sea coast of modern-day Germany, Denmark and Sweden, doing back at least as far as the Neolithic. Hairo is commonly identified with the culture indigenous to that area before the arrival of Indo-Europeans from the East, several millenia BC. The two peoples merged, presumably mostly peacefully, thereby laying the foundation for what would eventually become the Germanic language family. Pure Hairo survived only on the fringes of the original territory, such as on the islands Gotland and Rügen, where it was later demoted to minority status by an inflow of Germanic and later Slavic peoples, and finally assimilated or erased during the Christianization in the 12th century. Often persecuted as heathens, the later representatives of the Hairon culture had to keep their language and religion secret.

While hidden references, carved symbols and isolated embossed pieces of Hairon calligraphy have been found all over the area, the extant corpus of larger coherent texts in their language is limited. The two chief sources are cryptic fragments of a household book from the 9th century, known as the Codex Domesticus [1], and a collection of manuscripts by the German monk Conrad Vogelin [2] from the 11th century that includes some invaluable linguistic notes and translated Bible stories. The latter is commonly regarded as the rosetta stone of Hairo, and also as the last attested report of Hairo as a living language.

What little is known about the history, culture, religion and artwork of the Hairon people could still fill books. This site, however, is dedicated primarily to the language. A certain basic level of linguistic knowledge and some comprehension of its terminology is presumed from the reader.

My notations are "English", Hairo, quoted source, /phonemic/, [phonetic]. The latter two are written in X-SAMPA, with the following deviations from the standard: Primary and secondary stress are represented as /'/ and /,/ as opposed to the standard /"/ and /%/, for the sake of legibility. Diaereses (ä ö ü), esszett (ß) and circumflexes (â ê î ô û) are used on this site; adjust the character encoding if they do not display correctly.

Contents 


1.  Phonology

1.1.  Vowels

There are five vowel sounds, each available in a short and long version, which are phonemically distinguished. A quality difference is only attested between e/ê, the pronunciation of the former being described by Vogelin [2] as liderlich in solchem Maße / als daß mann versucht sey / es nicht transcribiren (i.e. "sloppy to the point where one is tempted not to transcribe it"). We provide a sensible phonemic notation and a best guess estimate for the phonetic realization:

Short
Long
a
/a/
[A]
â
/a:/
[A:]
e
/e/
[E], [3\]?
ê
/e:/
[e:]
i
/i/
[i]
î
/i:/
[i:]
o
/o/
[o]
ô
/o:/
[o:]
u
/u/
[u]
û
/u:/
[u:]

The following vowel combinations form a diphthong, whereas all others are to be taken as two separate syllable kernels: ai /ai/ [Aj], ei /ei/ [Ej], oi /oi/ [oj], au /au/ [Aw], eu /eu/ [Ew], ou /ou/ [ow].

1.2.  Consonants

The following consonant phonemes are distinguished:

Alveodental
Labial
Guttural
t
/t_h/
[t_h]
p
/p_h/
[p_h]
k
/k_h/
[k_h]
d
/t/
[t]
b
/p/
[p]
g
/k/
[k]
s
/s/
[s]
f
/f/
[f]
ch
/x/
[X]
sh
/s_h/
[s_h]
fh
/f_h/
[f_h]
h /h/
[h]
n
/n/
[n]
m
/m/
[m]
 
 
 
nh
/n_h/
[n_0_h]
mh
/m_h/
[m_0_h]
 
 
 

Miscellaneous
l
/l/
[l]
lh
/l_0/
[K]
r
/r/
[r]
rh
/r_0/
[r_0_h]
w
/w/
[w]
wh
/w_0/
[W]

Important: Obviously, all consonants come in pairs distinguished primarily by aspiration rather than voicing. Additionally, all consonants in a cluster share the same state of aspiration, and syllable-final clusters are always unaspired. This allows an alternate viewpoint on the phonemics of Hairo: That aspiration is not a feature of consonants but rather of vowels, e.g. that the word trâd [tr_0_hA:t] "birth" should be analyzed as /t/+/r/+/ha:/+/t/ rather than /t_h/+/r_h/+/a:/+/t/. This is exactly the way the native Hairon script represents aspiration. Thus trâd and drâd [trA:t] "honey" are written with the same consonant letters, but with different vowel letters: /ha:/ in the former, /a:/ in the latter. The consonant ch is considered unaspired, whereas h is not a consonant at all: The word hairo begins with the vowel letter /ha/.

Note: In this document, we adopt the convention of Leinbach & Neveu [3] to write /r_0 l_0 w_0 s_0 f_0/ in the vicinity of p t c as r l w s f rather than rh lh wh sh fh, and to spell the (always unaspired) clusters /st sp sk cht ft/ as st sp sk cht ft rather than **sd sb sg chd fd, for purely aesthetic reasons. Example: /pr_0ixt/ is clearly more legible spelled pricht than **prhichd.

1.3.  Stress

In general, a word is stressed on the first syllable. This also goes for composite words like gwîntrol "stable" from gwîn "bull" and rhol "house", but not for inflectional prefixes like rhe- in rhedomar "edible, destined to be eaten" from dom "to eat". The latter is sometimes written with hyphenation: rhe-domar, thus making the rule universal.

2.  Morphology

2.1.  Noun Morphology

Each noun comes in three forms, one for each of the core cases: absolutive, ergative, and genitive. In most cases, the ergative forms are related to the absolutive by unpredictable internal inflection, while the genitive is derived with perfectly regular suffixing. Grammatical number and gender are not marked on nouns.

There is some disagreement about whether Hairo's postpositions should also be considered cases (as e.g. in Finnish), since some sources fuse them with the preceding nouns, or link them with hyphen-like glyphs. Furthermore, two particular postpositions experience vowel changes to harmonize with the noun: hrol os "in the house", mern es "in the field"; ucht ur "with a hammer", bai ir "with the mouth". Seeing how the scope of a single instance can stretch over a complex phrase, though, the status as a postposition should be justified: mern hrol os {field house in} "in field and house".

The above example illustrates how juxtaposed nouns of the same case (absolutive or ergative) are taken to be a list rather than a single entity as in English ("field house" clearly refers to a house on a field rather than a house and a field). For one noun to modify another, it must appear in the genitive case: merne hrol {field:GEN house} "field house". The genitive is a bit of a misnomer, seeing as its meaning is not primarily possession, but description. A more accurate modern term would be construct case. The convention goes back to Vogelin's grammar, where he also misleadingly refers to the ergative and absolutive cases as nominative and accusative, for lack of non-Latinate grammar vocabulary.

As previously mentioned, the genitive case is formed very regularly according to the following rule.
As for the ergative derivation, most words can be attributed to one of the following inflection paradigms; however, it is impossible to predict the forms of a noun from its base form alone. A lexical entry must always include at least the absolutive and ergative forms.

2.2.  Adjective Morphology

Adjectives only have a single form, they do not inflect for case. They cannot be used as noun phrase heads by themselves, but have to be subordinated to the "dummy" noun lhâ, lheu, lhân.  Example: rêg "white", rêg lhâ "a white one".

Several productive endings exist to convert nouns and verbs into adjectives. All adjectives are also the base forms of verbs meaning "to be (adjective)". Example: ûrê "red", ûrê hlefarn "a red dress", an ûrê "it is red".

2.3.  Personal Pronouns

The default personal pronouns of Hairo comprise four grammatical persons and all three core cases, but no number. There are, however, contractions of idiomatic expressions available to specify number if necessary. The singular, paucal and categorical forms are composed of a genitive pronoun and the nouns chud, chudu, chude "self, proper", min, minu, mine "together" and warn, waran, warne "clan, people", respectively.

The fourth person is used to refer to another third person entity than the one already described with the third person pronoun. The third and fourth person pronouns are often taken to mean "the former" and "the latter".

 
Case\Person
1
2 3
4
Default
ABS
hu
se
an
in
 
ERG
ou
ai
na
ne
 
GEN
hun
sin
ane
ine
 
 
 
 
 
 
Singular
ABS
huchud
sechud
angud
ingud
 
ERG
huchtu
sechtu
achtu
ichtu
 
GEN
huchte
sechte
achte
ichte
 
 
 
 
 
 
Paucal
ABS
humin
semin
amin
imin
 
ERG
humnu semnu
amnu
imnu
 
GEN
humne
semne
amne
imne
 
 
 
  
 
 
Categorical
ABS
huwarn
sewarn
amwarn
imwarn
 
ERG
hufran
sefran
ambran
imbran
 
GEN
hurne
serne
ambrane
imbrane

Example: hun hrol "my/our house", huchte hrol "the house of me alone", humne hrol "the house of us together", hurne hrol "the house of us all, of our kind".

Thanks to the vector construction described in the next chapter, the personal pronouns are not used as often as in IE languages in general.

2.4.  Vector Morphology

The vector is an auxiliary verb inflecting for the person of both actor and patient, as well as aspect.  All finite verb forms are built with an instance of the vector. Since all other verbs only exist in the form of verbal nouns, one could well regard the vector as the sole true verb of the Hairo language (see Pleigh, [4]). One could gloss it as "to do; to be".

No tenses in the classical sense exist in Hairo — a narration of past, present or future events would all use the same verb forms. However, three aspects are distinguished: simple, perfect and imminent. There are separate vector forms for every aspect.

 
ABS\ERG
0
1
2 3
4
SIMP
0
a
ou
ai
na
ne
 
1
hu

whi
fta
fti
 
2
se
shu
shî
sta
sti

3
an
whan
chan
nân
nen
 
4
in
whin
chin
nain
nîn
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PERF
0
ê
tau
tei
nhâ
nhî

1
whê
ftau
ftei
ftâ
ftî
 
2

stau
stei
stâ
stî
 
3
ên
antu
ante
anâ
anî

4
în
intu
inte
inâ
inî
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 IMMI
0
rho
rhû
rhai
rhona
rhone
 
1
hu rho
hu rhû
hu rhai
hu rhona
hu rhone

2
se rho
se rhû
se rhai
se rhona
se rhone

3
an rho
an rhû
an rhai
an rhona
an rhone

4
in rho
in rhû
in rhai
in rhona
in rhone

The zero person inflection is used wherever a third person argument is either explicitly mentioned in the same sentence, or the argument slot is not used at all. The third and fourth persons are again used to distinguish two different third person participants in the narration. Examples:
  • Gwein rhûd a dom. {bull:ERG grass:ABS 0>0 eat} "The bull eats the grass."
  • Gwein a dom. {bull:ERG 0>0 eat} "The bull eats."
  • Rhûd a dom. {grass:ABS 0>0 eat} "The grass is eaten."
  • Gwein in dom. {bull:ERG 0>4 eat} "The bull eats it (the latter)."
  • Rhûd na dom. {grass:ABS 3>0 eat} "It (the former) eats the grass."
  • Nain dom. {3>4 eat} "The former eats the latter."
  • Nin dom. {4>4 eat} "The latter eats itself."
  • Gwein rhûd ê dom. {bull:ERG grass:ABS 0>0:PER eat} "The bull has eaten the grass."
  • Gwein rhûd rho dom. {bull:ERG grass:ABS 0>0:IMM eat} "The bull is about to eat the grass."
The simple aspect is the most commonly used, corresponding to the simple tenses in English. The perfect insists on completed verb action, and imminent describes verb action just about to happen. Examples: dom "eat", whan dom "I eat it", antu dom "I have eaten it", an rhû dom "I am about to eat it".

2.5. Verbal Morphology

Since the vector takes all inflection upon itself in a finite verb phrase, only non-finite forms of the actual verbs are needed. Three types of verbal nouns are provided: the gerund, the participles (one for each verb aspect), and what Vogelin [2] calls the unit (Eynhaitt), which refers to an individual, countable instance of the verb action, as opposed to the gerund, which describes the verb action in a more general, uncountable way.  All verbal nouns have two forms, representing the viewpoints of the actor (ergative argument) and patient (absolutive argument), respectively.

Verbal nouns are derived by a mostly regular and simple affixional paradigm. The choice of vowel in some endings depend on the last vowel of the verb stem, though. A table is given to show which stem vowels demand which ending vowels. If the last syllable of a verb stem contains a diphthong, the second component (the glide) determines the ending vowel.


Gerund
Participle
Unit


Simple
Perfect
Imminent

Actor

– (1)n
– one
rhe – (2)n
– ach
Patient
– âs
– arne
– ar
rhe – ar
– rach


Stem Vowel
a
e
i
o
u
Vowel (1)
â
î
î
û
û
Vowel (2) a
i
i
u
u

Examples: dom "to eat", domûn "eater", domone "one who has eaten", rhedomun "about to eat"; faild "to hit", faildâs "to be hit", faildach "a hit (scored)", faildrach "a hit (suffered)".

Important: Only the base form (actor gerund) is used to form finite verb phrases; it is ungrammatical to use the patient gerund together with a vector to form a passive. There is no passive voice in Hairo.

The participles are special nouns in that they can also function as adjectives without a morphological change. They are often used in place of a relative clause: hun hurf domûn carg {1:GEN semolina eater raven} "the raven who eats my semolina".

The imminent participles are often used idiomatically to express habit, tendency or destiny: ferd "to drink alcohol", rheferdin "prone to drinking, drunkard, alcoholic"; dom "to eat", rhedomar "destined to be eaten, edible".

3.  Syntax

3.1. Noun Phrases

tbc


Appendix: Pronunciation Help

Hairo employs several sounds not present in English and many other languages. For readers unfamiliar with the IPA or unable to pronounce the foreign sounds, we give the closest approximations from the English sound stock.

References


[1]
Weinmann S.M., Bürkli P., Nef D. et al., 1921, "Der Heirische Codex Domesticus", Pestalozzi Verlag Zürich
[2]
Hesseling V., Schmidtmayr K. et al., 1904, "Annotierte Manuscripten von Conrad Vogelin", Universitätsverlag Hamburg
[3]
Leinbach Th. R., Neveu J. P., 1964, "Hairo Morphology Revisited", Cambridge University Press
[4]
Pleigh E., 1971, "History's Loneliest Verb", Journal of Archaeolinguistics, 17, 89–95





© 2005 by Christian Thalmann <cinga at gmx dot net>